'Little Red Riding Hood Essay\r'

'One of the funniest of completely gimpys played by Freudian literary critics is that of decreeing sex symbols in obsolete cigarette taradiddles. It is a very easy game to play. Freud is said to have once remarked that a cigar manytimes is just a cigar, and psychoanalysts who write most tabby storys seem incapable of seeing them as just fantasies intended to entertain, instruct, and at times shake up young children. Bruno Bettelheim’s analysis of teensy-weensy passing Riding yobbo (LRRH), in his book The Uses of charm: The Meaning and Importance of Fairy Tales (1976) is a prize example of Freudian symbol searching.\r\nBut first, a brief hi tosh of this famous fable. The story began as a folk tale that European baffles and nurses t oldish to young children. The fable, in its many variants, came to the attention of Charles Perrault (1628-1703), a cut attorney turned poet, writer, and anthologist. He make superstar version in a 1697 collection of fairy tales- a book that became a french juvenile classic. Perrault opens his story â€Å"Le Petit Chaperon Rouge” (Little blushful Cape) by telling ab forth(a) a pretty colonisation female child who is called Little Red Riding Hood because she loves to wear a red cape and ceiling given to her by her grandma.\r\nHer mother hands her some biscuits and cover to take to the sick grandmother in a nearby village. Walking through a wood, LRRH encounters a tender barbarian who asks where she is going. After she tells him, the woman chaser says he’ll go at that place too, but by a different route and they’ll see who gets there first. The creature arrives ahead of the little girl, devours the grandmother, then crawls into adjourn. When LRRH shows up he simulates the grandmother’s voice, telling her to retch the biscuits and butter aside and climb in whap. LRRJ undresses and does as she is told. A famous dialog follows: â€Å"What colossal arms you have, gra ndmother!\r\nThe divulge to embrace you, my child. ‘What great legs you have! The better to run with, my child. What great ears! The better to hear with. What great eyes! The better to see with. What great teething! The better to eat you with. ” The wildcat then gobbles up LRRH and the story ends! I have been told, though I strongly doubt it, that French children find this decision amusing, and are not in the least dysphoric by it. Andrew Lang, who reprinted Perrault’s version in his disconsolate Fairy Book, severely criticizes Perrault for choosing a version with such(prenominal) a gruesome cultivation.\r\nWhen the German brothers Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm later published in 1812 their collection of more than 200 handed-down fairy tales, many taken from Perrault, they gave the story a less grim ending. In their version (you’ll find it in the Modern Library’s Tales of Grimm and Andersen), LRRH’s mother gives her sp watch over and a bott le of wine-colored- twineed to take to the ailing grandmother. LRRH is not afraid of the wolf when she meets him in the forest. He persuades her to pick some flowers to stock to her grandmother.\r\nWhile she is doing this (disobeying her mother who told her not to dawdle) the wolf hastens to the grandmother’s house, finds the door unlocked, enters, and promptly chow the grandmother. When LRRH arrives she is move to find the door open. She thinks it is her grandmother in bed because the wolf has pulled a nightcap over his face, and sheets over his body. LRRH stands beside the bed while the familiar dialog occurs about the wolf’s body parts. The wolf then springs out of bed and eat LRRH. He now goes plunk for to bed and falls asleep. A passing hunting watch hears the wolf’s loud snores.\r\nHe goes inside to investigate and is about to shoot the wolf until he realizes it may have eaten the grandmother. So he pulls out a knife and cuts open the wolf’s b elly. Both LRRH and the grandmother emerge as unharmed as Jonah when he was vomited out of the goliath’s belly. LRRH brings some big stones into the house to put inside the wolf, who is still asleep. When he awakes and tries to get away, the profound stones drag him down and he drops dead. The hunter skins the wolf and takes the skin home. The grandmother can hardly breathe, but she feels much better after eating the cake and drinking some wine.\r\nLRRH says to herself, â€Å"I will neer again wander off into the forest as long as I live, when my mother forbids it. ” The tale is short and simple. Its obvious moral is that children should obey their mothers when they pass through dangerous areas, and to beware of seemingly friendly strangers. I suppose it is the linking of LRRH’s beauty and purity with her grisly experience that has led to her capturing the hearts of so many adults everywhere, especially in Germany, France, Sweden, and England. â€Å"Littl e Red Riding Hood was my first love,” declared Charles Dickens.\r\nI felt that if I could have married Little Red Riding Hood, I should have cognise perfect bliss. ” Bruno Bettelheim devotes eighteen pages of his book on fairy tales to LRRH. [1] In his eyes the girl is not as innocent as she seems. She is at the nymphet stage when her untimely â€Å"budding cozyity” is creating oceanic abyss unconscious counterpoints mingled with her id (animal nature) and her superego (conscience), as well as between her consignment to what Freud called the â€Å"pleasure principle” and the â€Å"reality principle. ” Unconsciously, she wants to be seduced by her father.\r\nThe wolf’s eating her represents that seduction. The red color of LRRH’s hood, according to Bettelheim, symbolizes her unconscious sexual desires. He sees the gift of the hood by the grandmother as representing a transfer of sexual attractiveness from an old sick woman to a yo ung salutary girl. The grandmother is a symbol of the little girl’s mother. When the wolf ears the grandmother it represents the little girl’s wish to get rid of her mother so she can have her father all to herself. In Grimm’s version, Bettelheim sees the hunter as another(prenominal) father symbol.\r\nWhen he cuts open the wolf’s belly it indicates â€Å"the idea of pregnancy and birth,” thus coming â€Å"too close for comfort in suggesting a father in a sexual bodily function connected with his daughter. ” Bettelheim, of course, is not the only Freudian to read dark sexual meanings into the story. Psychoanalyst Erich Fromm, in The bury Language: An Introduction to the Understanding of Dreams, Fairy Tales, and Myths (1951) is in any case convinced that LRRH is experiencing unconscious sexual impulses and really wants to be seduced by the wolf. The red cape symbolizes her menstrual seam as she enters womanhood.\r\nWhen the mother warns her not to leave the trend or she qualification fall and break the wine bottle, it represents the mother’s fear that her daughter might lose her virginity by breaking her maidenhead. â€Å"The male is depicted as a ruthless and cunning animal,” Fromm writes. The sexual act becomes a â€Å"cannibalistic act in which the male devours the female. ” Fromm sees this as an expression of a deep antagonism toward men by frigid females who do not enjoy sex. The male wolf is â€Å"make ridiculous” by showing â€Å"that he move to play the role of a pregnant woman, having backup beings in his belly. The stones that LRRH puts in the wolf’s bide are â€Å"symbols of sterility” that cause him to collapse and die. The stones â€Å" fling his usurpation of the pregnant woman’s role. â€Å"\r\nâ€Å"The story,” Fromm concludes, â€Å"speaks of the male-female conflict; it is a story of triumph by man-hating women, ending with their v ictory, exactly the opposite of the Oedipus myth, which lets the male emerge rejoicing from this battle. ” Jack Zipes, who teaches German at the University of Minnesota, is the author of The Brothers Grimm (1986), a two-volume edition of Grimm’s stories, a collection of French folk tales, and other books on folklore.\r\nOne of his books is coroneted The Trials and Tribulations of Little Red Riding Hood (1983, updated in 1993). The book is a marvelous scholarly news report of the LRRH fable and its many versions and interpretations. Zipes covers all the oral variations that preceded Perrault, as well as the many retellings by writers from the Grimm brothers to 1993. slightly of the oral tales are even more pathological than Perrault’s version. In several versions the Wolf slices up the grandmother and pours her blood into a bottle.\r\nLRRH then eats and drinks what she thinks is meat and wine before the wolf eats her. In other versions LRRH escapes by telling the wolf she has to go outside to relieve herself. Thirty-eight variations of the tale are reprinted in Zipes’s anthology, along with a raft of illustrations from books and advertisements. At the back of the book he lists 147 published versions of the story, including retellings by Walter de la Mare and pile Thurber, as well as comic parodies, poems, plays, recordings, musicals, and films. His bibliography of unfavorable references runs to 153 items!\r\n'