American Indian Genocide Essay

When you think ab egress autochthonous Ameri skunks you think self-possessed village mint scarcely that is far from what re stilly happened. What happened in the final solution was genocide but would you consider what happened to the Native Americans was genocide? thither atomic number 18 lots of opinions and feelings about what happened standardised the traverse of tears in the Indian Removal Acts and the concentration camps where they were all moved from their land so the whites could score and the Indians would die of exposure. I dont think it was a entire genocide but most of the characteristics fit, so I would nonice it an internal and an Indirect- race slaughter. If you think what happened to the Native Americans was not genocide, what would you label it? First off Genocide it is the deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group.There are warning signs and events that occur in genocide and they are usually has a king or a powerful leader, and in the Native Americans story France and Britain had lots of power during the wars. Forcing kids and people to transfer to their beliefs or religion, and Indian kids were squeeze to go the camps to be taught the white mans modalitys. withal the person or people will deliberate both mentally and physically come out or attack a race. Indians were called stupid because of unlike ways to life and were putting to deathed because they were interrupted as savage.Then the is the word internal which is a conflict or struggle of both sides that usually results in savage behavior and slaughter of both groups that also fits into Americas History. The Native Americans fought back in the French and Indian War that happened from 1756 1763 so that event in the Native American history was more of an internecine then Genocide. The Europeans stereotyped the Indians The only good Indian is a unfounded Indian, Philip Sheridan 1869, because of their beliefs.The History o f the Native Americans was made up of lots of wars and battles that can go under different labels. I would consider what happened on the racecourse Of Tears from 1830 1837 was not a full genocide but I would label it an Indirect Genocide. Genocide contains deliberate mental and physically kill or attack a race, but in the Trail of Tears the Indians were not directly killed but the environment and lack of supplies killed them. The US presidency knew that the conditions were poor and that many would die but they did not care as long as they were off the land so they could expand. It was indirect murder because they sent them on a Trail of Death and did not kill them strait out like in the Holocaust where Hitler would kill Jews because they were Jewish.I would label that it was an Indirect-Genocide even though the Indians fought back they were out gunned and evenly forced to leave. I the beginning when pilgrims from Europe first tried to settle on North America they were killed by t he environment when the Indians watched. The Native Americans could have wiped them out but they knew that where they can from had strong military and maybe would send people to kill them for the death of the travelers and that reason it why lots of people put it was not genocide. I find it quite ironic that in the induce the Europeans were weak and dyeing from poor conditions then the Indians helped them gain power, then the Trail of Tears the Europeans sent the Indians on a walk where they died from conditions and environment but they had no one help them like the Native Americans had in at that place time of need.Some people did not even know all the terrible things that built North America so we would savour to label it with the same event as something bad like the Holocaust to try to show the level of the event. There are lots words to categorize what happened in the Native Americans throughout history, but as long as you can back it up it is an appropriate label. The histo ry of the Native Americans is like a puzzle made up of many different pieces because it was not all one event or one war. My opinion I that it was not full Genocide but Indirect-Genocide and Internecine and I showed my facts and argumentation and you can agree and disagree. History cannot be labeled one thing, the only thing history has in common is it made life the way it is today.