A Class Divided Documentary Review

A screen divided is a documentary well a teacher named Jane Elliot who teaches her students ab bulge expose racism first hand. She divides the students into two groups, the racy look, and the cook eyes. For the first twenty-four hours, the embrown eyeball children argon non cap competent to go to recess, or lunch at the same sentence as the rest of the children. They wear a blue misgiving or so their necks so that they ar obviously different at a distance from the other(a)(a) students. They are not allowed to drink from the same water fountains, use the resort area equipment, or even play with the blue eyed children.The next day, the roles are reversed. During these two days Jane Elliot would string comments rough the children wearing the collars to degrade them. She would smudge out if one of them wasnt ready on time, or if they forgot or sothing. She would plead things like Thats how blue eyed race are brownish eyed flock are better than blue eyed stack ( J. Elliot, A Class Divided, 1985). After the children who werent wearing a collar noticed Mrs. Elliot manifestation these kinds of things, they would too chime in and begin saying things about the kids wearing the collars.Mrs. Elliot said I watched wonderful, surveyful, children turn into nasty, vicious, discriminating teensy-weensy three graders. (J. Elliot, A Class Divided, 1985) . The word-painting showed the students come back for their 15th segmentation reunion to talk about this life long lesson that their third grade teacher taught them. All of the students said it was a lesson they progress to neer forgotten and something that deepend their lives forever. They talked about how it affected their lives growing up, and how it affects the way they raised or were currently raising their children.Since she got done teaching, Jane has been doing trainings are conferences to teach others. Her movie A Class Divided has been shown in prisons to inmates who are trying to ear n a degree. She also did training at a prison in Iowa for the guards and other staff members. When masses signed into the conflux they had to log whether they had brown eyes or blue eyes. Those with blue eyes had to wear a fountain ribbon. The people with brown eyes were qualified to go in and vex when the training was scheduled to start, where the blue eyed people had to stand out in the hall. The bathrooms were labeled browns only.The blue eyes werent told what was breathing out on, they were just told to wait outside, and administration would come out and tell them to be quiet. Meanwhile, Jane Elliot talked to those with brown eyes and told them that they were not to allow blue eyed people to sit beside them. She told them that brown eyed people were better than blue eyed people. She said that blue eyed people were no good and the brown eyes were to treat them as such. A while after the meeting started the blue eyes were able to come into the room. They had to sit in the ba ck, and some people didnt even have a seat.During the meeting Jane talked to the people with blue eyes a push-down store like she did to her students 30 long time ago. The reaction she got from the adults were a lot like they were in her experiment with the children, merely there was one woman who was a lot to a colossaler extent out spoken and rebellious toward Jane. Jane Elliot does a great job at not only telling people about racism and dissimilarity, but also showing how it affects us, and how easy it is to go with the crowd. Some of the movie takes place in a school, and this is a place where children are taught to socialize.Teachers play a coarse role in how students are molded, especially at such a young age. In this day and age, I dont cipher teachers really think about how much of an influence they are on their students. Most of the children transcend more time with their teachers than they do with their own parents. Jane took on this role and helped her students und erstand that there is an issue with discrimination and taught them a expensive lesson. When this documentary was filmed not everyone was taught that the burnish of your skin doesnt make up the type of person that you are.They were taught that if you are not white, you arent natural. They associated people that had a different skin color as magnanimous or even stupid. In those times it was totally gratifying and some people sincerely believed this. Things that are social agreeable potpourri over time and this is something that has changed in a big way. Im not saying that everyone doesnt care about the color of your skin. at that place is a lot of racism going on in our initiation today, but it is no where near as bad as it was 40 years ago.It reflects what we are taught by our parents also. If we are taught that black people are bad then we are going to believe that they are, and look at all of the bad things they do. We like to be the same as everyone else we do not like t o stand out. In the film a lot of people didnt dare to stand up for those wearing a collar because that would require them to stand up and go against what the authoritative anatomy was saying. This video relates to several chapters in our sociology book, the main chapter being chapter ten, race and ethnicity.This movie focused on the struggle in our country with discrimination of those with a different skin color, concentrating on blacks being the minority. At the time, people belief of black people are dirty, stupid, and bad people. They didnt think they were able to do anything as good as white people. Jane Elliot turned her schoolroom into a small discriminating society in a sense. She had the brown eyed students wear blue collars the first day and they were not able to do any of the same things that the blue eyed students did.She divided this class that was once a united class who played together, into a class that was split into two groups and mocked and make fun of each oth er, solely because of the color of their eyes. I also think we could relate this movie to chapter fourteen, where the book talks about education. Like I have stated before, teachers play a major role in their interaction with their students and how they stop be molded. Jane talked about going over the phonics card packs with the brown eyed students on the day that they wore the collars around their necks and it took them five and a half minutes to get with the card pack.On the day that they didnt wear the collar around their necks, and were inured with respect and felt as though they were sufficient, they only took two and a half minutes to get through the card pack. Jane talked about the time she performed this example for the second time with her third grade class. She said that the students course went up on the days where they were on top and went down on the days they were on bottom. After going through the exercise their overall scores would have a significant incline. Mr s.Elliot sent the results to Stanford Universitys Psychology Department to have them study and examine why this would be so. We could also relate this video to chapter seventeen, which talks about social change collective behavior, social movements and technology. Like I said, things that were once socially acceptable in those times are no longer acceptable now. In those days it was ok for people to say the word nigger it was a depot that people used for black people because thats the term everyone else was using. Now, it is considered a derogatory word and it is not acceptable to say it.I thought that this documentary was very interesting. I loved what Jane Elliot did with her students. I wish it was something more teachers could do, but now-a-days it probably couldnt be done because of the stink people would put up about it. I nip that some teachers spend too much time talking about topics and not nearly enough actually teaching. Jane taught her students a lesson that they have remembered and will never forget. It is something that they have taught or will teach to their children. The townspeople I grew up in was quite a bit like Riceville, Iowa. It was a small town, originally Christians who were white.In fact, there were only two black people in our town and they happened to be two of my cousins who were adopted. From as far as I can remember I was taught that skin color doesnt make up who the person is, Its what is on the inside that counts. My cousins and I had a great relationship with my cousins and it wasnt because of the color of their skin, or the color of mine that made the difference. I have met black people who I didnt like, and I have met white people who I didnt like. To me color makes no difference. I am very grateful that I was taught this lesson, and I feel and for those who havent been taught.I think it would be incredibly useful for this to be used in school. There are many other forms of discrimination other than people with different skin colors. Just because it is the form that is around widely talked about doesnt mean it is the only one. I bank in some way, maybe not by putting collars around their necks, but I do hope that this is taught in schools through out the years. References Peters, William. (1985). A Class Divided. PBS, Frontline Benokraitis, Nijole. V. (2012). SOC, (Student Edition) Belmont, CA Wadsworth, Cengage Learning