Evaluating Art Throughout The Ages Essay

Throughout the tale of maneuver, evaluation of operativeryistic works has continued even long by and by the artists lifetime. This is because the proper evaluation of any work of art involves an understanding of its cultural and historical context, its philosophy and the message the artist tries to convey. Although strike (aesthetics) used to be an important component of art evaluation, post-modern and abstract art have delegated it to obscurity. (Schaeffer)Below are some criteria relevant to evaluating art from any period of story 1. Technical quality and brilliance These consist of plaster cast (structure and expression), contrast (separation of object from background in many instances), texture, colour flourish or the use of lines (in line art), composition of various objects in the artwork and quality of craftsmanship. 2. artificeistic integrity and vision Artists should remain true to their world insure and to themselves.This authority not only uniqueness and ori ginality, but also remaining act to the ideal and style he is trying to depict. 3. Philosophy and world view This is often referred to the works hidden meaning, and the values it represents. E. g. in past cave art, the world view would often be related to the day-after-day wish fulfilment of bountiful hunting. Salvador Dalis artistic philosophy was ground on surrealism ( attached picture ), which often had a aspiration-like quality. 4.Relation to the artists lifes work, its genre and period in history Many of these qualities cannot be completely evaluated during the artists life time, and whitethorn require significant periods of time after its completion. In many cases it is neer complete e. g. masterpieces like the Mona Lisa continue to be evaluated, centuries after it was finished.Reference Schaeffer Francis (1978). Art and the Bible. Figure. Salvador Dalis Dream of a Virgin depicts his surrealistic philosophy, and a dream state.